🔒 This resource is locked
Login to unlock the full case deck
Login to Unlock
Nautica 2026 — Redesigning India’s Pollution Governance Through Systems Thinking and Citizen Co-Governance
A National Winner deck that builds a three-pillar integrated blueprint for air, land, and water governance — with phased funding, political strategy, and citizen accountability baked in.
1. About the Case Competition
Nautica 2026 is MDI Gurgaon’s flagship inter-institutional case competition, conducted in association with Grant Thornton, SBI, and Imperium — one of the most prestigious policy and sustainability-focused challenges in the Indian B-school calendar. Team Centurions from MDI Gurgaon and IIM Rohtak claimed the National Winners title, competing against top management institutions with a governance solution that was analytically grounded and politically credible.
2. Problem Statement Overview
India faces a multi-front environmental crisis no single program has resolved. Air pollution causes over 1.7 million premature deaths annually. Nearly 70% of wastewater is discharged untreated. Urban land waste generation stands at 62 million tons per year, with 15–20% methane contribution worsening air quality further. The root cause isn’t a lack of schemes — it’s fragmented institutional ownership, enforcement without real-time data, governance-light infrastructure investment, and citizens who remain passive beneficiaries rather than active accountability partners. Existing frameworks treat each pollution stream in isolation, making systemic impact impossible.
3. What This Deck Covers
The deck opens with a sharp problem prioritization — ranking air, water, land, and people-tech by lives affected — before presenting the Three-Pillar Integrated Governance Model: unified Air, Land, and Water governance coordinated through District Environmental Cells (DECs) — district-level command units integrating SPCBs, ULBs, and police, where an AQI spike automatically triggers waste and effluent audits across all three pillars simultaneously.
The political strategy is where this deck separates itself. The Align-Insulate-Incentivize (AII) framework navigates Centre-state reform tension by aligning new policies with existing schemes, insulating states from blame risk, and incentivizing compliance through AQI-linked grants and visible electoral health wins — a level of political nuance rarely seen in student decks.
The Citizen Ownership Model repositions citizens from passive beneficiaries to governance assets — RWAs, SHGs, and youth co-monitor pollution, and citizen inputs directly trigger municipal penalties and rankings. The funding structure is built on an outcome-linked model that ties disbursements to measurable AQI drops rather than activity completion, addressing the core incentive failure in India’s environmental spending.
Country benchmarking (Germany, USA, Singapore, Japan) is used surgically to validate specific mechanisms — never as padding.
Key takeaways for students:
- How to build a multi-pillar governance case without losing structural coherence
- Using the AII framework to handle political feasibility in policy cases
- Outcome-linked funding as a response to “how will you ensure compliance?” judge questions
- Treating citizens as governance infrastructure, not just stakeholders
- Benchmarking other countries as mechanism validation, not background filler
4. The Numbers
Air pollution: 7.3M deaths (2014–2023); water pollution: 37.7M diseased yearly; land waste: 62M tons/year. Total investment: ₹1,200 Cr (Year 1), ₹750 Cr (Year 2), ₹750 Cr (Years 3–4), ₹300 Cr (Year 5). Target outcomes: 20–25% AQI drop, 15–20% PM2.5 cut, 18–24% reduction in total health costs. Health link: 10% PM reduction = 12% fewer deaths.
5. Who Should Study This Deck
MBA and public policy students targeting sustainability, ESG, consulting, or government advisory roles. Anyone entering competitions involving urban infrastructure, climate governance, or SDG-linked policy strategy. The AII political framework and citizen co-governance model are transferable to virtually any public sector case. Students preparing for Paramarsh, PolicyKraft, CityScape, or similar policy-heavy competitions will find the narrative structure and framework density here directly applicable. Browse more winning decks at CaseBuzz.
6. Related Decks on CaseBuzz
- CityScape 2.0 — IIM Rohtak/Lucknow: Climate Resilient Urban Infrastructure — closest thematic match; urban governance and climate infrastructure pairs directly with Nautica’s three-pillar model
- Paramarsh 2.0 — IIM Raipur: Project Udaan Policy Framework — phased government reform structuring; strong complement on execution design
- PolicyKraft — IIM Kozhikode: National AI Governance Strategy — institutional accountability design at scale; mirrors Nautica’s governance architecture
- GNFC Neem Project: Profit with Purpose — outcome-linked impact model; pairs well with Nautica’s funding-to-outcome disbursement logic
- Paramarsh — IIM Raipur — citizen-governance integration frameworks; foundational read alongside this deck